For thousands of years the ancient civilizations of the world have
lived under some form of monarchy, whether it was a benevolent king or a blood-thirsty
warlord. They were absolute rulers who made all the decisions. Many countries in
the present champion the cause for democracy where the burden of decision
making is distributed between a group of many people for example Parliament and
Congress, but here is the question, is democracy really better than monarchy?
Monarchy isn’t so bad as long as there is a good, wise leader, and democracy is
for a nation that has people who care about the many decisions that have to be
made.
I realize that America is based on the idea of freedom. We fought
wars over it countless of times from the Revolutionary war to the Iraq war. We
have this deep sense of freedom and individuality ingrained into our very
beings, that just talking about communism or monarchy terrifies us to death
(the red scare). This is one of the biggest reasons why democracy works so well
for us, but is democracy the best form of government?
Monarchy on the other hand is ideal for a more unstable or
politically uneducated nation, where only one person rules. This may be
beneficial because decisions can be made faster because only one person is
making all the decisions and sometimes the ideas and decisions of one man can
be better than the ideas and decisions of the majority. For example, back in
the days of slavery, the majority of the population thought that slavery was
alright, going as far as finding passages in the Bible stating that slavery was
allowable (Exodus 22:2-3) but they were wrong (not the bible; the argument that
slavery is moral). We now recognize that slavery is an immoral thing but back
in the day the leading opinion was that slavery was alright. Thank goodness
that some smart, compassionate leaders like Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther
King Jr. opened our eyes to the horrors of slavery and helped abolish it and
segregation. I guess the biggest problem is how do you know that the person in
office is trustworthy? In the monarchy system, the people can’t chose who the
ruler will be, and if the public decides that the leader is unfit, they have to
start a civil war and riot on the streets. This can prove dangerous because
they may have to fight against the nation’s military that is under the rulers
thumb. This is where democracy is superior to monarchy.
In democracy, people elect their rulers from a group of willing
candidates. But the question now is will the willing candidates make good
leaders. Socrates in The Republic by
Plato states that an unwilling ruler is the best ruler because they will not
abuse there office by having their own agenda that would benefit only
themselves instead of the whole nation.
In a monarchy, the next ruler is predetermined. They are usually
the child of the current ruler or a close relative. Because the nation already
knows who will be the ruler, the child is taught from early childhood the
qualities of being a good ruler. They are taught to put the good of the nation
before themselves and how best to do that. They are given enormous
responsibility at a young age so they gain experience in leadership. They are
primped and preened into the ideal ruler. The current princes of England aren’t
lazy couch-potatoes who just enjoy there palaces and extravagant parties. They
are prominent leaders in society. In fact Prince William of Cambridge co-pilots a search and rescue helicopter helping ordinary civilian’s every day. This type
of job is mandatory to a prince so they already have many accomplishments
before they ascend the throne. Would this be a mandatory requirement for an
elected official? Did President Obama ever go to war or help his citizens in a
life-saving way?
In Code Geass, Emperor Charles is a tyrant. He conquered peaceful
nations and brought them into the Holy Britannian Empire, a monarchy. His
various children were raised to become leaders and generals to further the Britannian
cause. Some like Schneizel, Cornelia, and Lelouch are raised to become military
and political strategist while others like Odysseus, Clovis, and Nunnally are
sent to be budding rulers or governors of Britannian colonies. In a monarchy, the children of rulers are
raised to be either rulers or people of political or military importance giving
them more experience in leadership should one of them become the next emperor.
Briefly comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both
democracy and monarchy I have come to that monarchy is the better form of
government, but we should be able to overthrow the ruler easily in case they
turn out to be a psychotic mass murder like Queen Mary I of England aka Bloody Mary.